top of page
Turquoise Sky

How common are wrongful convictions and why do they occur

Wrongful convictions occur surprisingly frequently but the Australian criminal justice system does not keep statistics. Based on extrapolations, especially from the UK which has had a Criminal Cases Review Commission for over 20 years, a recently published book estimates that in Australia there may be around nine instances per year, with most going unrecognised[1].

There are multiple factors that can contribute to a wrongful conviction and usually more than one contributing factor can be identified in any particular case. Wrongful convictions are more likely to occur where a prosecution case is based predominantly on circumstantial evidence and where complex forensic or other technical evidence is contested among competing expert witnesses.

The following list of potential contributing factors has recently been published[2]:

“To summarise, the factors that have been widely reported to contribute to wrongful convictions are listed below. We have discussed the majority of these but not all.

  • misleading or inadequate or poorly validated forensic science and other expert opinion evidence;

  • tunnel vision and confirmation bias affecting police, expert witnesses and even courts;

  • unreliable opinion evidence which then biases other evidence and its interpretation;

  • police over-zealousness, incompetence or corruption;

  • prosecutor misconduct, including failure to disclose exculpatory evidence; 

  • false or coerced confessions, especially from vulnerable suspects;

  • inappropriate reliance on police informants or prison informants;

  • mistaken eyewitness evidence including misleading line-up identification procedures; 

  • perjury by witnesses as well as perjury and/or negligence by criminal justice officials;

  • ineffective, inexperienced or under-funded defence counsel;

  • the reliance on juries to assess the validity and reliability of scientific and medical evidence;

  • erroneous judicial directions to the jury;

  • media pressure and/or stereotyping; and

  • Indigenous ethnicity of the accused.

To this list we should add the difficulty that judges, barristers and juries may have in comprehending complex forensic or scientific evidence.”

 

[1] See Wrongful Convictions in Australia by Stephen Cordner and Kerry Breen. Australian Scholarly Publishing 2023.

[2] See Wrongful Convictions in Australia by Stephen Cordner and Kerry Breen. Australian Scholarly Publishing 2023.

bottom of page